|
|
There
are a lot of seminaries out there to choose from. What sets DBTS apart from
the others?
There are
several important distinctives which set DBTS apart from other seminaries, even
some that could be classified as conservative. A simple summary is listed here.
DBTS is:
- Baptist
in heritage
- Fundamental
in position
- Dispensational
in approach
- Local
church in ideology
In addition,
DBTS places a strong emphasis on expository preaching, systematic theology (not
just biblical theology), and the use of the original biblical languages. For
additional information on our position as a fundamentalist institution it would
be helpful to consult "An Inside Look at Ecclesiastical Separation," written by Dr. Rolland D. McCune. It would also be helpful to review material
presented at MACP in past years. An example of this
would be, "Fundamentalism at the Start of the 21st Century," the 2001
theme for MACP.
Back
to Top
What is the seminary’s position on the King James Version?
Doctrinal Statements
Although our seminary has not written a book dealing with the translation issue, we have published a clear statement
regarding our position on the doctrines of inspiration and inerrancy. This statement is located on our website under Media Resources. A broader statement on the doctrine of Bibliology is included in the seminary's Statement of Faith.
Journal Articles
We have also published a number of valuable articles in the Detroit Baptist Seminary Journal dealing with various aspects of the debate. These too are available on the website in downloadable format.
Recommended Books There are a number of books that we can recommend, though the list has been kept brief. You may also want to
reference the seminary's recommended
book list concerning the doctrine of Bibliology.
- White,
James R. The King James-Only Controversy. Minneapolis, MN: Bethany
Book House, 1995. This is probably the best overview and synopsis of the issue
in one volume.
- Carson,
D. A. The King James Version Debate. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books,
1979. Carson offers a more technical analysis of the textual issues behind
the debate.
- Williams, James B. and Shaylor, Randolph, editors. From the Mind of God to the Mind of Man: A Layman's Guide to How We Got Our Bible. Greenville, SC: Ambassador-Emerald International, 1999.
- Williams, James B. and Shaylor, Randolph, editors. God’s Word in Our Hands: The Bible Preserved for Us. Greenville, SC: Ambassador-Emerald International, 2003. This recent book includes chapters by a wide range of fundamentalist leaders, including two DBTS alumni, Daniel Davey and Mike Harding.
- Beacham,
Roy E. and Kevin T. Bauder. One Bible Only? Examining the Exclusive Claims
for the King James Bible. Grand Rapids, MI: Kregel Books, 2001. This recent
book by the faculty of Central Baptist Theological Seminary in Minneapolis
deals with the issue from a fundamentalist perspective. Basically, this new
work is a revision of their earlier book, The Bible Version Debate,
1997. One flaw in this volume is its treatment of preservation (See William Combs' article above).
Back
to Top
|